Is the Use of the Indian National Flag as a Mark Allowed?

In India, the national flag is highly valued. Every Indian citizen respects it, which inspires pride and patriotism. National flags help us remember who we are, celebrate our achievements, and unite us in our love for our country.

 The article explores the legal, cultural, and ethical dimensions surrounding using the Indian national flag in various contexts.

Answering whether the Indian national flag can be used as a trademark is complicated. The delicacy lies in addressing the issue with due respect for the flag’s significance while accurately reflecting the legal restrictions and practical implications.

Introduction

The Indian National Flag is a symbol connected with a nation’s identity, history, and values. It unites the people of a country together by exceeding individual differences. Disrespecting the symbol of a flag is seen as a disregard for your nation. Respecting the Indian Flag not only shows your respect towards the nation but also the sacrifices and victories of our ancestors for ‘FREE INDIA’.

The Indian National Flag is also known as ‘Tiranga’ (Tri color) which was adopted on July 22, 1947, by the Constituent Assembly of India as a symbol of national unity and independence. The flag features a horizontal tricolor of saffron (orange) at the top, white in the middle, green at the bottom, and 24-spoke navy blue Ashoka Chakra (wheel) in the center of the white stripe.

The color saffron represents courage and sacrifice, white signifies truth, peace, and purity, and green stands for faith, fertility, and prosperity. The chakra represents the ‘Wheel of The Law, ‘ meaning that life thrives through movement and progress, while stagnation leads to decline and decay.

Legal Framework Relating to the Use of the Indian National Flag

The regulations surrounding the use of the flag have evolved. Here given below is the list of legal frameworks relating to the use of the Indian national flag:

1. Constitutional and Legal Provisions

According to the Constitution of India, it is a fundamental duty of every citizen to respect the flag, leaving no option.

Part IV—A, Article 51A (a) of the Indian Constitution states that it is the duty of every citizen of India to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, including the National Flag.

2. Flag Code of India,2002

The code has set some rules on how to use a flag. Here are some;

Permissible Uses:

• It can be displayed on public and private buildings during national holidays and events.
• It should be displayed from sunrise to sunset but can be displayed 24/7 if illuminated.
• It can be used in educational institutions and government offices.

3. Impermissible Uses:

• Should not touch the ground, floor, or water.
• It should not be used for any form of advertisement or promotion.
• It should not be worn as clothing or draped over vehicles.
• It should not be used in any manner that could disrespect its dignity, such as being used as a seat or tablecloth.

The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950

The law regulates the use of National Symbols from misuse. It strictly prohibits using the national flag for professional and commercial purposes. This includes using the flag as a trademark, logo, or mark for any commercial enterprise.

Section 3 of the Act states that no one can use the Indian national flag, its name, or any similar design for business purposes, trademarks, or patents unless they get permission from the Central Government.

Section 4 states the penalties for violating the prohibitions in Section 3.

Under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act of 1950, the following are prohibited for unauthorized use:

• Indian National Flag.
• Names or images of the President of India, Rashtrapati Bhavan, and Raj Bhavan.
• Ashoka Chakra or Dharma Chakra, as seen on the Indian National Flag or government seals.
• Names or images of Mahatma Gandhi, Shrimati Indira Gandhi, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, the Prime Minister of India, and the words ‘Gandhi’, ‘Nehru’, or ‘Shivaji’, except for specific uses on calendars where only manufacturer and printer details are included and not for advertising.

Trade Marks Act, 1999

Section 2 (1)(m) of the Act defines a Trademark as the sign that distinguishes an enterprise’s goods and services from others. The definition excludes symbols of national significance, including the national flag, from being registered as trademarks.

Section 3 – This section lists the grounds for refusing a trademark application. A trademark cannot be registered if it consists of a flag or emblem of a State or any international organization.

Section 31-This provision ensures that using the Indian National Flag as a trademark is not permitted under any circumstances.

These legal provisions collectively ensure that the Indian National Flag is protected from being used as a trademark, thereby preserving its dignity and national significance.

Related Judgments in Connection with Flag and Emblem

Below are some of the famous judgments on cases related to trademarks in connection with national flag, emblems, and names.

RAVIKANTH SHINDE Vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2003

This case concerns a violation of Section 3 of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. The petitioner seeks to stop the respondent from producing and selling their “kitchen salt” under the trademark “Dandi.”

 The petitioner argues that the trademark, pictorial representation, suggests a connection to Mahatma Gandhi’s historic Dandi March. The court acknowledged that the trademark indeed creates an impression linking the salt to Mahatma Gandhi and the Dandi March.

NAVEEN JINDAL Vs UNION OF INDIA CASE, 2004

In this case, Naveen Jindal was prevented from flying the Indian national flag due to restrictions in the Flag Code of India. He argued that this restriction violated his fundamental rights under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.

The court ruled that the Flag Code is a set of guidelines rather than a formal law. While citizens are not restricted from exercising their right to fly the flag, it must be done respectfully.

JINDAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Vs THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, 2022

In this case, the petitioner’s trademark registration was rejected because it used an outline map of India, which was claimed to violate Section 9(2)(d) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The petitioner argued that the Survey of India permitted the use of the map.

According to the Schedule of the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, the court ruled that using an outline map of India is not prohibited. Therefore, the petitioner could use the outline map in their trademark.

SOUTH INDIA TEXTILES Vs GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH And OTHERS AIR 1989 AP 55J

In this case, the petitioner applied for firm registration under Section 58(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, for “The South India Textiles.” The authority returned the application requesting the removal of the word “India” from the firm name, citing its prohibition under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.

Upon review, the court found that Section 58(3) of the Act prohibits using words like “Crown,” “emperor,” “king,” etc., which imply government sanction or patronage unless expressly permitted by the State Government. Since “India” does not fall into these prohibited categories, the court ruled that government sanction was not required. Therefore, the court allowed using “India” in the firm’s name.

GOENKAROCHO EKROT Vs UNION OF INDIA AIR 2007 BOM 184

In this case, the Registrar of Trademarks rejected the petitioner’s application for the mark “GOA 1000 GUTKA” based on Section 9(2)(d) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Registrar argued that the mark was in violation due to its reference to a place.

However, the Bombay High Court overturned this decision. The court noted that the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, does not specifically prohibit using place names. The court concluded that the name of a place, like Goa, does not imply government endorsement or patronage, so there are no restrictions on using such names in trademarks.

Conclusion

The Indian National Flag is protected from being used as a mark or trademark under multiple legal provisions. The Flag Code, Emblems and Names Act, and Trade Marks Act collectively prohibit such usage to preserve the dignity and significance of the flag. These regulations ensure that the flag remains a respected symbol of national unity and pride, and any commercial or unofficial use that might degrade its significance is strictly prohibited.

The combined effect of these laws and judicial interpretations is a strong protection against using the Indian National Flag in any manner that could potentially commercialize or disrespect it. Top of FormBottom of Form

For trademark registration, patent registration and other IP services, visit Corpbiz.

Frequently Asked Question