{"id":54178,"date":"2023-03-30T15:40:39","date_gmt":"2023-03-30T10:10:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/?p=54178"},"modified":"2023-03-30T15:40:40","modified_gmt":"2023-03-30T10:10:40","slug":"changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994\/","title":{"rendered":"Changes Brought By the Amendments in the EIA Notification Post-1994"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Till\n1994, the process of environmental clearance was an administrative decision and\nneeded more legislative support. Then in 1994, the first EIA Notification was introduced\nand made mandatory for new projects and the expansion or modernisation of any\nindustrial activity listed in Schedule 1 of the notification. This notification\nversion underwent 12 amendments until 2006, when a new notification was\nreleased. The objective of Amendments in the EIA Notification 2006 was to\naddress the remaining limitations in the 1994 Notification. The 2006 version\nwent through another series of amendments. In 2020, the Ministry of\nEnvironment, Forest and Climate Change released a draft Notification to replace\nthe 2006 notification. However, due to criticism faced from the public, the\nnotification remains to be implemented. Today, the 2006 notification still sees\namendment from time to time, the latest being in 2022. In this article, we will\nunderstand the evolution of both versions of the EIA Notification concerning\nthe amendments issued from 1994 to the present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title ez-toc-toggle\" style=\"cursor:pointer\">Page Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 eztoc-toggle-hide-by-default' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994\/#EIA_Notification_1994\" >EIA Notification, 1994<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994\/#EIA_Notification_2006\" >EIA Notification 2006<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994\/#Draft_EIA_Notification_2020\" >Draft EIA Notification, 2020<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/changes-brought-by-the-amendments-in-the-eia-notification-post-1994\/#Conclusion\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"EIA_Notification_1994\"><\/span>EIA Notification, 1994<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In the 1994\nversion of the notification, a project proponent of any project given in\nSchedule 1 had to obtain environmental clearance from the Central Government. At\nthe screening stage, the project proponent assessed if the proposed\nactivity\/project came under the purview of environmental clearance. Then the\nproponent conducted an EIA study either directly or through a consultant. In\nthis version of the notification, scoping was not applicable. The proponent\ncompletely decided the terms of reference without any public consultation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Amendments in the EIA Notification Of 1994<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification 1994 (April 1997):<\/strong> The public hearing\nprocess was introduced in the environmental clearance process. The SPCBs\nconducted a public hearing to gather views and concerns of the community that\nwill be affected and other interested parties. The Board was also entrusted\nwith forming a public hearing committee to ensure fair representation in the\npublic hearing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (June 2002):<\/strong>&nbsp;This amendment diluted the\npurpose of the notification. Projects such as&nbsp;pipeline and highway\nprojects were exempted from the EIA process. Many projects were entirely\nexempted from the entire environment clearance process based on the level of\ninvestment. If the investment in a project were less than Rs 100 crore in the\ncase of new projects or less than Rs. 50 crores in the case of expansion or modernisation\nof projects, the proponent was not required to obtain environmental clearance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (February 2003):<\/strong>\u00a0The MoEF considered location sensitivity in the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/environmental-clearance\">environment clearance<\/a><\/strong> process and prohibited certain procedures and operations in specified areas of the Aravalli range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (May 2003):&nbsp;<\/strong>This amendment expanded the\nlists of activities involving risk or hazard, such as major irrigation projects\nriver valley projects, including hydel power projects and their combination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (August 2003): <\/strong>The government tried bringing\nlocation sensitivity to the entire environmental clearance process through this\namendment. Projects that were located in a critically polluted area, within a\n15 km radius from the boundary of reserved forests, or ecologically sensitive\nareas such as national parks, sanctuaries, and biosphere reserves were now to\nobtain clearance from the Central Government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (September 2003):<\/strong>&nbsp;This amendment made\nsite clearance mandatory for greenfield airports, petrochemical complexes and\nrefineries. Another provision was added in which no public hearing was required\nfor exploration activities from offshore and beyond 10 km from the nearest\nvillage boundary, ecologically sensitive areas, national parks, coral reefs, marine\nparks, sanctuaries, reserve forests and breeding\/ spawning grounds of marine\nlife.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (July 2004):<\/strong> This amendment made EIA\nmandatory for construction and industrial estate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification (July 2005):<\/strong>&nbsp;Through this amendment, projects\nrelated to the expansion or modernisation of river valley projects, nuclear\npower and related project, ports, harbours, thermal power plants, and airports\nand mining projects with an area of more than 5 ha could be taken up without\nprior EC. The Central Government in the MoEF could relax the requirement of\nobtaining prior EC and grant temporary working permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"EIA_Notification_2006\"><\/span>EIA Notification 2006<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The 1994\nnotification was superseded by <strong>the EIA Notification of 2006<\/strong><sup><a class=\"text-primary\" href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentwb.gov.in\/pdf\/EIA%20Notification,%202006.pdf\"><strong>[1]<\/strong><\/a><\/sup>. The significant\nchange brought by the 2006 Notification was related to the decentralisation of\npower. The projects in Schedule-1 were divided into Category A and B. Category\nA projects required clearance from Central Government (M0EF), while Category B\nrequired clearance from State Government (SEIAA). However, the state government\nwas first to assess if the B project fell under the B1 or B2 category, a\nfurther categorisation of Category B. Category B2 Projects did not need EIA\nreporting in the EC process. B1 projects required the preparation of EIA. The\nappraisal authority in such cases appointed SEIAA. The key highlights of the\n2006 notification, after coming into effect, included the following.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Scoping:<\/strong> A scoping was introduced\nin the new notification, and the responsibility of determining the terms of\nreference (ToR) was given to the Expert Appraisal Committee. Scoping was\nrequired in the case of Category A and B1 projects. However, the final ToR by\nthe EACs depends on the information given by the proponent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Public Consultation-<\/strong> All\nCategory A and B1 projects were required to undertake public consultation\nexcept for specific exemptions such as expanding roads and highways,\nmodernising irrigation projects, etc. The responsibility for conducting the\npublic hearing was now with the SPCBs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Amendments in the EIA Notification 2006<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>The frequency\nwith which the EIA Notification has been amended can be understood from the\nfact that more than 300 alterations have been made to the 2006 version since\n2011. Some of these amendments were minor and included in only small\ninsertions, substitutions and deletions in the notification. But some modifications\nwere significant and brought new dimensions to the 2006 notification. The\nnumber of paragraphs in the original notification has increased from 12 to 14,\nand many new appendices have been added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<table class=\"wp-block-table table table-bordered\"><tbody><tr><td>\n  Appendix No.\n  <\/td><td>\n  Scope\/Area \n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX VII\n  <\/td><td>\n  Qualifications and terms for the Experts in\n  DEIAA and DEAC\n  &nbsp;\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX VIII FORM 1 M &nbsp;\n  <\/td><td>\n  Application for mining of minor minerals under\n  category \u2018B2\u2019 for less than and equal to five hectares.\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013 IX\n  <\/td><td>\n  Exemption of certain cases from the requirement\n  of environmental clearance\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013 X\n  &nbsp;\n  <\/td><td>\n  Procedure for preparation of district survey\n  report\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013 XI\n  <\/td><td>\n  Procedure for environmental clearance for mining\n  of minor\n  minerals including cluster\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013 XII\n  <\/td><td>\n  Process for obtaining \u201cNo Increase in Pollution\n  Load\u201d certificate\/permission from the State Pollution Control Board\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013XIII\n  <\/td><td>\n  Environmental conditions for buildings and\n  construction\n  (Category 1: 5000 to &lt;20,000 Square meters)\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX-XIV\n  &nbsp;\n  <\/td><td>\n  Accreditation of Environmental auditors\n  (Qualified Building\n  Auditors)\n  <\/td><\/tr><tr><td>\n  APPENDIX \u2013XV\n  <\/td><td>\n  Environmental cell at the level of local\n  authority\n  <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (October\n2007):<\/strong> This amendment prescribed the qualifications and eligibility\ncriteria concerning Chairman and Member EAC by substituting the eligibility\ncriteria given in APPENDIX VI for chairman EAC and other members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (December\n2009)<\/strong>: through this amendment, the project proponent of Category\n&#8216;A&#8217; projects was to make the award of the environmental clearance process\npublic and host the environmental conditions and safeguards by advertising it\nat least in two local newspapers in the area where the project is located. The\nproponent was also to display the details on its website permanently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (January\n2016): <\/strong>it was one of themost\nimportant amendments. The following were the significant changes introduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>A new category of \u2018B2\u2019 was inserted in the schedule,\nwhich was related to the mining of minor minerals.<\/li><li>Led to the formation of DEIAA for matters falling\nunder Category \u2018B2<\/li><li>The amendment put mining of minor minerals up to 5\nhectares of mining lease area under the preview of new committees DEIAA and\nDEAC at the district level.<\/li><li>Formation of District Level Expert Appraisal\nCommittee (DEAC) and defined their structure, term, qualifications of the\nexpert as well as their function.<\/li><li>Exemption of cases from prior EC&nbsp; as specified in Appendix IX, such as extraction\nof ordinary clay or sand, manual extraction of ordinary clay or sand, manual removal\nof sand deposits on agricultural fields, customary extraction of sand and\nordinary earth from Gram Panchayat for community or personal use in the\nvillage.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (March\n2016):<\/strong> This amendment introduced paragraph 13 for preparing and presenting\nthe EIA report and EMP. Only consultant organisations accredited for a\nparticular sector and the project category for that sector with the QCI or NABET\nor any other agency notified by the MoEF from time to time will be allowed to\nprepare the EIA report and an EMP for a project.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (November\n2016)<\/strong>: expansion\/change\/modernisation of product mix in existing\nprojects were exempted from the requirement of prior environmental clearance\nthrough this amendment. The amendment further provided that the project\nproponent follows the procedure for obtaining the certificate for No Increase\nin Pollution Load concerned SPCB given in Appendix \u2013XIII.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification (December\n2016): <\/strong>This amendment put in place a new framework and the\ninstitutional structure for streamlining the EC process for the building and\nconstruction sector. This amendment was a move towards delegating powers and\nenhancing the country&#8217;s &#8216;Ease of Doing Responsible Business&#8217;. The highlights of\nthe amendment were<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The amendment mainly focused on integrating standard\nand objectively monitorable. All building and construction projects covering\n20,000 sq. mt and above were subjected to environmental clearance given by the\nSEIAA. <\/li><li>Under the revised norms, environmental clearance\nwere to be issued integrated along with the building permit under building\nby-laws.<\/li><li>Also, the SLA subject to EIA will give clearance\nfor built-up areas from 1,50,000 to 3,00,000 sq. mt, while the MoEF will clear\nthose projects over 3,00,000 sq. mt.<\/li><li>The Townships and Area Development projects\ngreater than 3,00,000 sq. mt built-up area or covering an area \u2265 150 ha area\nwere included in Category &#8220;A&#8221; of the Schedule and appraised by MoEF.<\/li><li>Area less than 20,000 sq. mt. will be subject to a\nself-declaration, and buildings of size 5000 sq. mt to 20,000 sq. mt will also\nfollow environmental norms in the construction and maintenance phase.<\/li><li>For the first time, the Qualified Building\nEnvironment Auditors, as empanelled by the MoEF&amp;CC, were to assess and certify\nthe building projects and provide self-declaration for compliance and\ncertification by Qualified Building Environment Auditors was introduced for\nbuilding.<\/li><li>Provision for an Environmental cell in the local\nauthorities to appraise and monitor building projects and provide environmental\nplanning in this area was made. The Environmental cell was to have independent\nsectoral experts. After completion of the project, the cell will randomly check\nthe projects for compliance, including five years audit report.<\/li><li>No Consent to Establish and Operate was needed\nfrom the SPCB for residential buildings of built-up areas up to 1,50,000 square\nmeters.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments in the EIA Notification in 2021: <\/strong>EIA Notification 2006 was changed about\n33 times through 24 official orders and nine amendments. The significant\namendments were related to the extension of validity of existing environmental\npermissions of projects, the extension of terms of central and state expert\nappraisal panels, and specific exemptions to the thermal power plants,\npharmaceutical sector, manufacturing and mining of coal, minerals and ordinary\nearth for linear projects etc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These changes were sector-specific\neasing of regulations, tightening grip on expert panels and state authorities,\ncorporate environment authority, Exemption of additional sectors from public\nhearing and Environment clearance and changes to the clearance and compliance\nprocess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Amendments\nin the EIA Notification of 2022<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>This\namendment exempted highway projects of\nstrategic and defence importance from environmental clearance. This\nhelped the government do away with the need for clearance for the&nbsp;construction of the Char Dham project.<\/li><li>Exemption to the thermal power plant: Thermal power plants based&nbsp;on\nbiomass or non-hazardous municipal solid waste and upto&nbsp;15 MW capacity that used auxiliary\nfuel up to 15 per cent&nbsp;were\nalso exempted.<\/li><li>Ports that cater to small fishermen and deal in\n     fishing were also exempted\n     from environmental clearance. Also, toll plazas that need width expansion for\n     the installation of collection booths and other expansion activities in\n     airports without an increase in the airport&#8217;s existing area were exempted.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Draft_EIA_Notification_2020\"><\/span>Draft EIA Notification, 2020<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>MoEF&amp;CC\npublished the draft EIA Notification in 2020 under the Environment (Protection)\nAct, 1986, to replace the existing EIA Notification, 2006. Key Proposals of the 2020 Draft include.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Reduced\nTime for Public Hearings<\/strong>: The 2020 draft proposes reducing the notice\nperiod for public hearings from 30 to 20 days. Furthermore, from the 39\nsectors, a host of projects were exempted from public hearings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Exemption\nof Projects: <\/strong>Category B2 projects did not require Environment\nClearance (EC), unlike the Category A and B1 projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Annual\nSubmission of Reports:&nbsp;<\/strong>The new draft notification\nproposes the submission of compliance reports annually as compared to the\nhalf-yearly submission. Environmental experts believe that allowing a more\nextended period to fill the compliance report will enable project proponents to\nhide disastrous consequences that could go unnoticed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Post-facto\nClearance:<\/strong>&nbsp;Another major proposal in the 2020 draft is the provision\nfor &#8216;post-facto clearance&#8217; where a project operating without environmental\nclearance can be regularised or allowed to apply for EC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Penalty for Firms<\/strong>: in case\nthe firms that have to get the clearance are found violating the terms of their\nestablishment, they will have to pay a fine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The Amendments in the EIA Notification post-2006 were an attempt to reduce the burden on the central government by decentralising the issuance of environment clearance and making the EC process more efficient. With numerous amendments in the 2016 version, it remains to be seen by what extent the government will modify the notification further or whether the 2020 draft notification will do justice to both environment and project proponents when it is implemented. Maintaining the balance between &#8216;ease of doing business\u2019 and \u2018environmental sustainability\u2019 is an arduous task that needs to be dealt by the government. However, whatever changes will be made when the 2020 draft notification comes into effect after considering public comments and views remains to be seen. Irrespective of the changes, the complexities of managing the environment clearance process must be under the guidance of experts for the seamless completion of projects and avoid any significant roadblocks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Also Read<\/strong>:<br><a href=\"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/environmental-clearance-process-in-india\/\">Environmental Clearance Process In India: A Complete Outlook<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Till 1994, the process of environmental clearance was an administrative decision and needed more legislative support. Then in 1994, the first EIA Notification was introduced and made mandatory for new projects and the expansion or modernisation of any industrial activity listed in Schedule 1 of the notification. This notification version underwent 12 amendments until 2006, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":54179,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3161],"tags":[3349],"acf":{"service_id":"688"},"authorName":"Shalin Verma","authorImageUrl":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-16.jpg","authorDescription":"Shalin is a Postgraduate in Applied Sciences from the University of Delhi with a specialisation in Wildlife Forensics. He has an in-depth knowledge of the environment domain and keen interest in curating informative content. Some of his research work includes research on environmental science and transboundary wildlife offences.","postViews":3938,"readingTime":8,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54178"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54178"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54181,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54178\/revisions\/54181"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/54179"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/corpbiz.io\/learning\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}